Making Nature Historical: Darwin, Revolution and the Politics of Evolution

This essay grew from MLitt work completed under the supervision of Dr Bill Jenkins at the University of St Andrews.

Evolutionary theory did more than explain the diversity of life. It made nature historical. Species, environments and even humanity could be understood as products of change rather than permanent points in a divinely ordered system. In an age already transformed by political revolution and industrialisation, that temporalisation of the natural world carried implications far beyond biology.

From classification to history

Eighteenth-century natural history had developed powerful systems for naming and classifying organisms. Institutions such as the Linnean Society brought collectors, botanists, zoologists and geologists into conversation. Classification did not disappear in the nineteenth century, but it became increasingly entangled with questions of origin: why did species resemble one another, how had they become geographically distributed, and could they change?

Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace presented natural selection to the Linnean Society in 1858, but the theory drew upon decades of work in geology, breeding, anatomy and biogeography. Its novelty did not consist in the bare suggestion that species changed. Earlier writers had already proposed transmutation. Darwin and Wallace offered a mechanism through which adaptation and divergence could occur without a predetermined goal.¹

Chambers and the danger of speculation

Robert Chambers’s anonymously published Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (1844) brought a developmental history of nature to a wide public. It connected cosmic, geological and biological change within a progressive narrative. The book was commercially successful and intellectually provocative, but critics attacked its science, materialism and implications for humanity’s place in creation.²

The reaction helped shape Darwin’s caution. On the Origin of Species initially avoided an extended discussion of human evolution and grounded its case in a wide body of observation. Darwin’s long work on barnacles was not an eccentric diversion; it helped establish his authority as a specialist capable of making reliable distinctions among closely related forms.

Malthus, struggle and natural selection

Thomas Malthus’s population argument provided Darwin and Wallace with a crucial way to think about selection. If more organisms are born than can survive, variations affecting reproduction and survival will become consequential. Yet Malthus was not a neutral source of biological truth. He wrote against the radical optimism of William Godwin and Condorcet, arguing that population imposed limits upon schemes of indefinite social improvement.³

Natural selection therefore emerged through a movement between political economy and natural history. That intellectual borrowing does not make evolutionary theory merely a defence of conservative economics. It does show that scientific concepts are assembled from languages carrying prior political arguments. Once transferred into biology, “struggle” acquired new meanings and could later be carried back into society again.

Was Darwinism a creed of capitalism?

Herbert Spencer coined “survival of the fittest” and applied evolutionary language to social development. Later industrialists and commentators used competition in nature to portray economic inequality as necessary or beneficial. Such arguments naturalised capitalism by presenting markets as expressions of an unavoidable biological law.

It is important, however, to distinguish Darwin’s biological theory from every ideology later called “Darwinian”. Natural selection offered no simple ethical instruction. Competition was one component of a complex account that also included dependence, cooperation and adaptation. “Social Darwinism” became a retrospective label covering positions that differed substantially from one another.

Evolutionary language could also support critiques of capitalism. Karl Marx admired Darwin’s historical treatment of nature and recognised a parallel with material change in human society, while rejecting the projection of bourgeois competition onto all life. The same scientific development could therefore be appropriated by defenders and opponents of industrial order.

Science and religion beyond a simple war

Darwinism is often placed within a timeless conflict between science and religion. Victorian responses were more varied. Some clergy rejected transmutation as an attack on design and human distinctiveness. Others reinterpreted scripture, separated theological meaning from scientific mechanism or treated evolution as the means through which providence operated.⁴

Darwin’s own position changed over time. His early theological education gave way to doubt, and he later described himself as agnostic rather than an atheist. Personal loss, reflection on suffering and the explanatory reach of natural selection all affected his beliefs. References to a Creator in editions of the Origin should therefore be read within the history of the text and its audiences, not extracted as a simple confession of faith.

Public advocates such as Thomas Henry Huxley were often more confrontational than Darwin. Their arguments concerned professional authority as well as doctrine: who possessed the right to interpret nature, and whether science could govern itself independently of clerical institutions.

Voyage, empire and the production of evidence

Darwin’s voyage on HMS Beagle supplied observations that later became central to his thinking. It was also made possible by the networks of the British Empire: naval surveying, specimen collection and correspondence connected distant environments to metropolitan institutions. Modern evolutionary science grew through these global systems of movement and extraction.

To describe Darwin as a Victorian, as Adrian Desmond and James Moore insist, is therefore to place his work within industrial society, religious controversy, imperial travel and changing institutions of expertise. Context does not diminish the theory’s scientific importance. It explains the world that made its questions, evidence and reception possible.

Conclusion

The nineteenth-century natural world became temporalised: species acquired histories, environments changed and humanity was relocated within nature. Darwin’s theory formed part of that revolution, but its political meanings were never fixed. Competition, progress, cooperation, providence and materialism could all be argued through evolutionary language.

Intellectual history helps separate natural selection from the ideologies attached to it without pretending that science stood outside society. Evolution was simultaneously a biological explanation and a resource within wider struggles over religion, empire and industrial modernity.

---

Related Reading

Continue exploring related themes across The Intellectual Historian:

• Edinburgh before Darwin: Lamarckism, Natural History and Evolutionary Debate
• R. A. Fisher, Statistics and the Political History of Eugenics
• Beyond the Age of Reason: Constructing the Enlightenment

Notes

1. Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species (London: John Murray, 1859), chs. 3–4. ↩
2. James A. Secord, Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 1–39. ↩
3. Robert M. Young, “Malthus and the Evolutionists: The Common Context of Biological and Social Theory,” Past & Present 43 (1969): 109–45, at 109–20. ↩
4. John Hedley Brooke, Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 275–320. ↩

Selected Bibliography

• Brooke, John Hedley. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
• Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray, 1859.
• Desmond, Adrian. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
• Moore, James R. The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
• Secord, James A. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
• Young, Robert M. “Malthus and the Evolutionists: The Common Context of Biological and Social Theory.” Past & Present 43 (1969): 109–45.

---

Article word count: 1,007 words